No Tags Found!

Dear Friends,
Hazcom is designed to reduce incidence of chemically-related occupational illnesses and injuries; Called “worker right to know” ; Ensures that all chemical hazards in workplace are identified and explained .
PFA herewith very nice and informative presentation.
Please share your views and valuable suggestions.

From India, New Delhi
Attached Files (Download Requires Membership)
File Type: pptx HAZARD COMMUNICATIONS.pptx (251.0 KB, 1073 views)

Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Ramesh, Now a days when I open this cite I look for your posts. Your posts are enriching. Even todays post is excellent. Keep on sharing. Thanks & Regards, Sudhir
From India, Vadodara
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

I must say that earlier, I was also connected with many HR forums. But in recent days, whatever information and knowledge I have gained through this forum is incredible, especially in the matter of safety and hazards. The presentations shared by Mr. Ramesh and other members are very informative and useful. Thanks for sharing these presentations and stuff.

With Thanks,
Priyanka Varshney

From India, Karnal
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear Ramesh,

Good.

Dear all,

Once again, I am asking the same question that I posted a long time ago. Why is Hazard Communication focusing only on chemicals? Why are no physical hazards being communicated, or is it restricted only to chemicals? I have noticed many presentations focusing solely on chemical hazards, and I am unable to find answers to my questions. Could anyone clarify this for me?

If clarifications are not available, then we need to consider changing the approach. Along with chemical hazards, we should also address all potential hazards. Why can't we create a new program?

Thank you.

From India, Delhi
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear KVS,

Nice to see you after a short break on our forum.

Let's get to the topic:

Why is Hazard communication focusing only on Chemicals? Why are no physical hazards being communicated, or is it restricted only to chemicals?

To ensure that the hazards of all chemicals produced or imported are classified, and that information concerning the classified hazards is transmitted to employers and employees. The Hazard communication plan/standard is specifically focusing on chemicals.

For example, the Fall Protection Plan - If one of our employees is standing above 10 meters and conducting water testing (chlorine). In this case, we can't address chlorine safety measures in the fall protection plan. Similarly, we can't address fall hazards in the hazard communication plan.

What I mean is, "I can't." The standards clearly state what needs to be addressed in the fall protection plan and Hazard communication plan. We need to follow the standard.

Hazard Communication plan/program:
Safety and Health Topics | Hazard Communication | HAZCOM Program

An effective HAZCOM program depends on the credibility of management's involvement in the program; inclusion of employees in safety and health decisions; rigorous worksite analysis to identify hazards and potential hazards, including those which could result from a change in worksite conditions or practices; stringent prevention and control measures; and thorough training. It addresses hazards whether or not they are regulated by government standards. The following references characterize and further explain HAZCOM programs.

Fall Protection Plan:
Link outdated-removed (Search On Cite | Search On Google)

Employers engaged in leading-edge work, precast concrete construction work, and residential construction work who can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use conventional fall protection systems must develop and follow a fall protection plan. Below are sample fall protection plans developed for precast concrete construction and residential work that could be tailored to be site-specific for other precast concrete or residential jobsites. This sample plan can be modified to be used for other work involving leading-edge work. The sample plan outlines the elements that must be addressed in any fall protection plan. The reasons outlined in this sample fall protection plan are for illustrative purposes only and are not necessarily a valid, acceptable rationale (unless the conditions at the job site are the same as those covered by these sample plans) for not using conventional fall protection systems for a particular precast concrete or residential construction worksite. However, the sample plans provide guidance to employers on the type of information that is required to be discussed in fall protection plans.

Hope I answered your query.

Note: Standards only say we should address the content available in the standard. As long as we develop a plan with the required contents, then if we need to address any other hazard, we can create new content other than the standard. Once we do that, surely our client/management will raise the question and ask us to create a separate plan for a specific hazard.

Most of all, the presentation and plans cover the standard so we cannot expect all in one place. If we want, we can make it.

That's what I understand from specific plans; we will see our members' views on this topic.


From United States, Fpo
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

There is a whole specialized area of HAZCOM or hazard communication. Warning signs and symbols indicate tripping hazards, high voltage, even impact hazard from doors that open outward. A search on HAZCOM should net plenty of examples.

As for chemicals, each work area is supposed to have a binder of Material Safety Data Sheets for each chemical, such as cleaning solvents, that could be hazardous if consumed, inhaled, or spilled. A quick search of MSDS should find examples and criteria.

Good topic: nobody wants to be hurt or see anyone else get hurt.

Cheers//JC

From United States, San Diego
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

For your question—Why are only chemicals covered in the Hazard Communication Standard? In the US, according to OSHA requirements, Hazard Communication for chemicals is a legal mandate. It is commonly referred to as the HAZCOM requirement.

Best Regards,
Thanking You,
B.S. Gopala Krishna, BE (Elect), DIS (CLI)
OM Sri Krishna Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Consultants
Lead Assessor ISO14001/OHSAS 18001
Mobile No: 97313 98860
Residence No: 080 2348 5012
Bangalore 560079

From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Dear all,

Good afternoon. I am a new member of this group. Please clarify the difference between DOT labeling and NFPA labeling. In what situations should different labeling be used? What are the other common chemical labeling practices followed across the world? Which one is internationally accepted?

Regards,
R.T. Selvan

From Oman, Nizwá
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)

Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.





Contact Us Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms Of Service

All rights reserved @ 2025 CiteHR ®

All Copyright And Trademarks in Posts Held By Respective Owners.