Dear Experts:
In an ID, the Labour Court has come to the conclusion that the Domestic Enquiry held against the delinquent employee was fair and proper. In such an event, the same Labour Court allowed the petitioner to adduce additional evidence by allowing the additional proof affidavit filed by him.
My query is :
Once the preliminary issue is finalized as above by passing an exclusive order by the Labour Court, whether the Labour Court allowing the further evidence and filing additional documents are correct?
Whether the Management can prefer a writ petition against such labour court action of allowing additional proof affidavit by the workman and further evidence and to stall the Labour Court proceedings till the finality in this issue is arrived it?
Any other relevant details, if any, be shared with please.
Thanks & regards,
V SRIDHARAN
From India, Mumbai
25In an ID, the Labour Court has come to the conclusion that the Domestic Enquiry held against the delinquent employee was fair and proper. In such an event, the same Labour Court allowed the petitioner to adduce additional evidence by allowing the additional proof affidavit filed by him.
My query is :
Once the preliminary issue is finalized as above by passing an exclusive order by the Labour Court, whether the Labour Court allowing the further evidence and filing additional documents are correct?
Whether the Management can prefer a writ petition against such labour court action of allowing additional proof affidavit by the workman and further evidence and to stall the Labour Court proceedings till the finality in this issue is arrived it?
Any other relevant details, if any, be shared with please.
Thanks & regards,
V SRIDHARAN
From India, Mumbai
Community Support and Knowledge-base on business, career and organisational prospects and issues - Register and Log In to CiteHR and post your query, download formats and be part of a fostered community of professionals.
SUPREME COURT DECISION ON BASIC WAGES.pdf