Dear Friends,
One of my friends recently resigned from his position as VP-Projects at a reputed construction company in Chennai. He served the company with distinction for 4 years and 10 months. However, when he was relieved, he discovered that the company is not paying him the gratuity, claiming that he has not completed 5 years of service. I would like to know if he is eligible to receive the gratuity and, if so, what options are available to him. I would also like to mention that the company has a Gratuity Trust managed by LIC.
I am eagerly awaiting your prompt response.
Regards,
Deepak P
Chennai.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)
Amend(0)
2One of my friends recently resigned from his position as VP-Projects at a reputed construction company in Chennai. He served the company with distinction for 4 years and 10 months. However, when he was relieved, he discovered that the company is not paying him the gratuity, claiming that he has not completed 5 years of service. I would like to know if he is eligible to receive the gratuity and, if so, what options are available to him. I would also like to mention that the company has a Gratuity Trust managed by LIC.
I am eagerly awaiting your prompt response.
Regards,
Deepak P
Chennai.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Deepak,
The 4 years and 240 days clause is applicable for those who are retired or deceased, not for resignation cases. For resignation cases, 5 years of service are compulsory. Hence, the person is not eligible to claim gratuity. The condoning or waiving of the period of 2 months will not be applicable for resigned cases.
Thank you.
From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The 4 years and 240 days clause is applicable for those who are retired or deceased, not for resignation cases. For resignation cases, 5 years of service are compulsory. Hence, the person is not eligible to claim gratuity. The condoning or waiving of the period of 2 months will not be applicable for resigned cases.
Thank you.
From India, Kumbakonam
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr Deepak, Yes you are entitled for Gratuity even not less than 5 years service, Please find attached the judgment of Hon. Madras High court for Your reference. Thanks Sujeet
From India, Jaipur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Jaipur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Deepak,
Your friend is entitled to gratuity because of a deeming clause of completion of service of 5 years. I advise you to serve a notice to the employer in Form "I" demanding the amount of gratuity for 5 years of service in the following manner:
Rate = Salary/26
Amount of Gratuity = 15 X 5 X Rate
In case no reply is received or your claim is rejected, approach the Controlling Authority under the PG Act. In your state, the Assistant Commissioner of Labour is the proper authority. File your claim in Form "N" together with documents such as the appointment letter, salary slip, notice, etc. I am sure you will have your claim.
Additionally, you can also file a complaint with the Inspector under the PG Act, who happens to be the Government Labour Officer.
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Your friend is entitled to gratuity because of a deeming clause of completion of service of 5 years. I advise you to serve a notice to the employer in Form "I" demanding the amount of gratuity for 5 years of service in the following manner:
Rate = Salary/26
Amount of Gratuity = 15 X 5 X Rate
In case no reply is received or your claim is rejected, approach the Controlling Authority under the PG Act. In your state, the Assistant Commissioner of Labour is the proper authority. File your claim in Form "N" together with documents such as the appointment letter, salary slip, notice, etc. I am sure you will have your claim.
Additionally, you can also file a complaint with the Inspector under the PG Act, who happens to be the Government Labour Officer.
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Deepak, As other members suggests, your friend entitled for Gratuity.even if he doesnt reaches 5 Years of tenure.it will be applicable only in chennai region.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
No, the employee is not eligible.
Eligibility criteria for gratuity are:
1) Five years of continuous service.
2) If the employee dies within a minimum period (which may not be completed in 5 years), they are eligible.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Eligibility criteria for gratuity are:
1) Five years of continuous service.
2) If the employee dies within a minimum period (which may not be completed in 5 years), they are eligible.
From India, Chennai
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
boss. As you have mentioned about 240 days clause applicable to only retired on completion of 4.10 yrs. Please provide the supporting document to all of us.
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Deepak,
Yes, you are entitled to gratuity even with less than 5 years of service. Please find attached the judgment of the Hon. Madras High Court for your reference.
Thanks,
Sujeet
Yes, he is eligible for completion of 4.10 years of service. Contact the local Inspector of Factories and Assistant Labour Commissioner with the relevant relieved documents that show the continued rendering of service.
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Yes, you are entitled to gratuity even with less than 5 years of service. Please find attached the judgment of the Hon. Madras High Court for your reference.
Thanks,
Sujeet
Yes, he is eligible for completion of 4.10 years of service. Contact the local Inspector of Factories and Assistant Labour Commissioner with the relevant relieved documents that show the continued rendering of service.
From India, Ahmadabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please review the corrected version below:
---
Please go through the blog for clarity.
[HR SUCCESS TALK: 13 facts one should know about Gratuity Act in India!!](http://hrsuccesstalk.blogspot.in/2013/03/13-facts-one-should-know-about-gratuity.html)
---
I have corrected the spelling, grammar, and formatting errors in the text provided.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
---
Please go through the blog for clarity.
[HR SUCCESS TALK: 13 facts one should know about Gratuity Act in India!!](http://hrsuccesstalk.blogspot.in/2013/03/13-facts-one-should-know-about-gratuity.html)
---
I have corrected the spelling, grammar, and formatting errors in the text provided.
From India, Hyderabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I have seen most of the replies. I expected an analysis of the term "Continuous Service" in PGA and the deeming proviso to that definition. It appears that Gratuity is payable only when 5 years of service are completed. However, if you consider the definition of "continuous service," it allows you to claim gratuity upon completion of 4 years and 240 days in the fifth year. This means that 4 years and 8 months of service are sufficient to claim Gratuity. This interpretation is irrespective of the judgment of the Chennai High Court.
In the case at hand, there is a service of 4 years and 10 months. Hence, there should not be any difficulty in claiming Gratuity. 5 years of service, in actual terms, amounts to 4 years and 240 days only.
This interpretation is applicable nationwide and not restricted to the state of Tamil Nadu alone.
Adv. K. H. Kulkarni.
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In the case at hand, there is a service of 4 years and 10 months. Hence, there should not be any difficulty in claiming Gratuity. 5 years of service, in actual terms, amounts to 4 years and 240 days only.
This interpretation is applicable nationwide and not restricted to the state of Tamil Nadu alone.
Adv. K. H. Kulkarni.
From India, Kolhapur
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear friends,
As you all know, this subject is one of the few matters discussed in this forum repeatedly. Again and again, the same points are raised by different schools of thought: one in favor and the other against. In my view, the stance taken by those who don't advocate for 4 years and 240 days is a pessimistic one, rather than based on irrefutable sound legal provisions. I am saying this based on the Supreme Court's judgment regarding what constitutes "continuous service," i.e., 240 days. According to this judgment, it would be sufficient if an employee completes 240 days of "continuous service" each year. Therefore, there should not be a different treatment for the 5th year, as it is the terminal year. Completing 4 years and 240 days in the 5th year should automatically qualify for the minimum gratuity under the Gratuity Act. I have not come across any judgments where gratuity is legally denied for those who have not completed the full 5 years of service. I fully support the views of Adv. K.H. Kulkarni and sympathize with those who do not understand this concept.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
As you all know, this subject is one of the few matters discussed in this forum repeatedly. Again and again, the same points are raised by different schools of thought: one in favor and the other against. In my view, the stance taken by those who don't advocate for 4 years and 240 days is a pessimistic one, rather than based on irrefutable sound legal provisions. I am saying this based on the Supreme Court's judgment regarding what constitutes "continuous service," i.e., 240 days. According to this judgment, it would be sufficient if an employee completes 240 days of "continuous service" each year. Therefore, there should not be a different treatment for the 5th year, as it is the terminal year. Completing 4 years and 240 days in the 5th year should automatically qualify for the minimum gratuity under the Gratuity Act. I have not come across any judgments where gratuity is legally denied for those who have not completed the full 5 years of service. I fully support the views of Adv. K.H. Kulkarni and sympathize with those who do not understand this concept.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
He is eligible if he present 240 days in a fifth year.means 4 year and 240 days. In that case he is eligible for gratuity.
From India, Gandhinagar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Gandhinagar
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Dear Mr. Bhaskar,
Please read the judgment shared by Mr. Sujeet of the Madras High Court, which is binding on the state of Tamil Nadu. Honorable Justice Abdul Wahab clearly stated that a person who had been in the service of an organization for 240 days or more in the fifth year is eligible for gratuity. If you read the judgment closely, you will find that the person who claimed gratuity in the case was neither terminated nor died but resigned. Hence, there is no question of a short period waiver. Moreover, there is no such thing. Mr. Deepak's friend's case is exactly the same as the attached judgment. Even here in Delhi, you can claim gratuity by applying the same principle given under the Madras High Court judgment on the subject. Referring to Chennai, it has a binding effect, and Mr. Deepak's friend is entirely entitled to gratuity even if he resigned. If a company is managing its trust, it cannot make its own rules to govern the trust. It can give more but not less than what is prescribed under the Act.
I would request you to give it another consideration in the light of the attached judgment. In my opinion, he is entitled to gratuity.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Please read the judgment shared by Mr. Sujeet of the Madras High Court, which is binding on the state of Tamil Nadu. Honorable Justice Abdul Wahab clearly stated that a person who had been in the service of an organization for 240 days or more in the fifth year is eligible for gratuity. If you read the judgment closely, you will find that the person who claimed gratuity in the case was neither terminated nor died but resigned. Hence, there is no question of a short period waiver. Moreover, there is no such thing. Mr. Deepak's friend's case is exactly the same as the attached judgment. Even here in Delhi, you can claim gratuity by applying the same principle given under the Madras High Court judgment on the subject. Referring to Chennai, it has a binding effect, and Mr. Deepak's friend is entirely entitled to gratuity even if he resigned. If a company is managing its trust, it cannot make its own rules to govern the trust. It can give more but not less than what is prescribed under the Act.
I would request you to give it another consideration in the light of the attached judgment. In my opinion, he is entitled to gratuity.
From India, New Delhi
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I think Deepak is eligible for the gratuity.as per my knowledge mr Deepak must claim as tod by boss.
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
Sir, I am 100 percent sure that the person is eligible for gratuity as few days back one employee from my company resigned with same situation and I myself have handed over the cheque from lic trust.
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Gurgaon
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
In addition to above members i also agree that the concern person is eligible for payment of gratuity in all respect. Thanks & Regards, From, Sumit Kumar Saxena
From India, Ghaziabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Ghaziabad
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I want to know about the Gratitude eligibility. Please suggest the exact days. In a few instances, it is mentioned as 4 years and 240 days eligibility for Gratitude, while in some cases, it is stated as completing 5 years. Please suggest.
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
From India, Bangalore
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
I am searching for the judgment in The Payment of Gratuity Act;
The Employee has worked in 3-4 different establishments where all the Owners are different but the place of work is the same, and the job of the employee is the same.
All the establishments are working as contractors for the Principal Employer. All the establishments are closed at intervals of 3 to 4 years.
Let's say:
1. A Firm started in Jan 2012 & closed in Dec 2015
2. B Firm started in Jan 2016 & closed in Dec 2018
3. C Firm started in Feb 2019 & closed in Mar 2022
4. D Firm started in Apr 2022 & remains in operation till date.
In such a case, my opinion is that the employee is eligible for Gratuity.
Require Senior Views,
Regards, Arihant
From India, Surat
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)
The Employee has worked in 3-4 different establishments where all the Owners are different but the place of work is the same, and the job of the employee is the same.
All the establishments are working as contractors for the Principal Employer. All the establishments are closed at intervals of 3 to 4 years.
Let's say:
1. A Firm started in Jan 2012 & closed in Dec 2015
2. B Firm started in Jan 2016 & closed in Dec 2018
3. C Firm started in Feb 2019 & closed in Mar 2022
4. D Firm started in Apr 2022 & remains in operation till date.
In such a case, my opinion is that the employee is eligible for Gratuity.
Require Senior Views,
Regards, Arihant
From India, Surat
Acknowledge(0)Amend(0)Looking for something specific? - Join & Be Part Of Our Community and get connected with the right people who can help. Our AI-powered platform provides real-time fact-checking, peer-reviewed insights, and a vast historical knowledge base to support your search.
Minimum Qualifying service for Gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act.docx