Dear Vishal Bharadwaj,
I recommend you approach a professional lawyer to draft the legal agreement. This is because while making a legal agreement, adherence to the proper legal terms is important. A poorly drafted agreement may defeat its exact purpose.
Please clarify from the lawyer, should it be a "bond" or "indemnity"? In legal parlance, the definition of a bond is a written agreement in which someone receives the bond (monetary payment) and promises to engage in a specific act, i.e., performing under a contract or appearing in court. A failure to perform results in the party’s forfeiture of the money previously given, or a requirement of the party to pay a sum of money to cover the failure to act.
We need to be absolutely clear about what will happen if either party violates the terms of the bond.
Now coming to using the word indemnity. The definition of indemnity is security or protection against financial liability. It typically occurs in the form of a contractual agreement made between parties in which one party agrees to pay for losses or damages suffered by the other party.
An employee gets remuneration for the work he/she does. Therefore, the wages paid to the employee are legitimate dues. Now if the employee breaks the bond, how will you prove that the employer has suffered the losses? To prove it, what legal provisions need to be inserted? All these questions are best answered by the lawyers.
Lately, it is observed that the word indemnity has been used very loosely. All types of agreements with the employees or with their relatives upon receipt of death compensation have also become indemnities. It is better to do due diligence better entering into an agreement with the employee(s).
This is an HR forum. Your query pertains to contracts which are governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Not all HR professionals are well-versed in this law. What you would like to do is to lock the employee's career to the company by paying him some extra amount. However, are these lock-in agreements legally tenable? How to decide this?
One more point. What if the employee turns hostile later and says that he did not sign the agreement out of his volition but it was taken from him forcibly? How will you prove that the agreement was not forced upon him?
I have given the above suggestion because there are smart people who have turned the tables against their employers. Therefore, better to do sufficient homework rather than, in future, wring your hands in despair.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar