IS EMPLOYEE SERVING NOTICE PERIOD NOT ELIGIBLE FOR VARIABLE PAY?

K.B.Thiagarajan
Dear Professionals,

I have a query. An employee worked in an organization from 2009 to mid-July 2022 (14 years) in the same organization. He held a mid-level position and was eligible for variable pay. The variable pay period is from July '21 to June '22, and the payout is in July '22.

He served a notice period from 16th May '21 to 15th July '22 - two months as per policy - and was relieved on 15th July in an agreed and mutual exit.

He received his salary for working 15 days in July. However, the variable pay was not paid. He was informed that he is not eligible because he is not on the payroll during the payout month. There is no written policy, oral communication, or any communication on the same to any employees until now.

Please let me know your inputs on whether the employee is eligible for variable pay.

Thanks
K.B.Thiagarajan
Hi Professionals,

Has anyone come across this situation? Can someone guide me on this?

Thank you.
KK!HR
The stand that an employee serving notice period is not on the rolls is patently wrong and grossly unjust. The employee is on the rolls of the company till he is relieved, and that would extend to the midnight of that day. The rules and regulations of the company would apply to the employee until he is finally relieved from service.

As far as the organization is concerned, the revised VDA applies from July 1, and the old VDA ceases to apply on 30th June. There cannot be a selective extension of benefits to those continuing in the organization and deny it to the employees on notice period. This is discriminatory and patently illegal.

I know that there is a widespread practice of denying many due benefits to resigned employees, but it is incorrect and illegal.
ommygautam
Variable pay is also part of the CTC, so it must be paid to the concerned employee. Yes, it's another thing that it may differ according to his performance or as per the standard for variable pay, but not paying is injustice.
saswatabanerjee
This is actually a software error or deficiency. Logically, the HR Manager should speak to accounts and get the amount paid.

Since the employee has worked for a long time, it would be better if he could just speak to a senior manager and try to get it resolved. Trying to take a legal route for a half-month variable pay is a bad idea, especially since the new company will come to the old one for a BGV. So it is always good to work it out on a good note.
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute