Dear Friends,
According to Section 3(1) of the Building and Other Construction Worker's Welfare Cess Act, 1996 (in brief the Cess Act), the cess is levied on the 'cost of construction' incurred by an employer.
The word 'employer' is not defined under the Cess Act; but according to section 2(d) of the Cess Act, the words and expressions used but not defined and defined in the Building and Other Construction Workers (RECS)Act, 1996 (in brief, the Main Act) shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act.
Under the Main Act, The word 'employer' is defined in section 2(1)(i) which says that in relation to an establishment, it means the owner thereof and include:-
(i)....... the authority or head of govt. deptt.;
(ii)....... the chief executive officer or authority of a local authority; and
(iii) in relation to a building or other construction work carried on by or through a contractor, or by the employment of building workers supplied by a contractor, the contractor.
In the ultimate analysis, therefore, for the purpose of payment of Cess, we have to construe that person as employer who has 'incurred the cost of construction'. Now, it would the easy to ascertain as to who is the real employer - whether a contractor or the owner. Even if the contractor pays according to his agreement with the owner, it is the owner from whom he gets reimbursement of the same. Hence, in my view, in real terms, the owner is the employer for the purpose of levy and collection of cess as per section 3(1) of the Cess Act.
Best wishes,
Jpratap