Dear Jawad Kamgar,
Dissatisfaction about the performance rating is common across all industries. To prevent the dissatisfaction of the subordinate, the Manager or the performance reviewing authority is expected to take the following measures:
a) First and foremost, the goals or the KRA designed should be Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound, i.e., SMART.
b) The goals or KRAs designed should be communicated to the junior employee at the beginning of the performance cycle. The performance cycle could be quarterly, half-yearly, or yearly.
c) Each goal or the KRA should be to measure either cost or ratio or the turnaround time. What needs to be increased or decreased and that too what time span must be mentioned clearly.
d) While designing goals or the KRAs, take into consideration the subordinate's educational qualification, level of experience, designation, etc.
e) To attain the goal or KRA, the subordinate should face the deficiency of the resources. The resources could be physical, knowledge, financial, etc.
f) Appraise on the representative information. Representative information means the rating should be based on the evidence of the performance. At the beginning of the performance cycle, the subordinate must be told that to prove his/her performance, he/she must maintain sufficient evidence.
g) Manager's duty does not end once the performance goals or the KRAs are designed. He/she must give adequate support to the junior employee to attain the goals or the KRAs.
If the above precautions are taken, then the chances of a dispute on the performance rating are minimal. Nevertheless, even if the dispute arises, then the benefit of the doubt must be given to the junior employee.
Thanks,
Dinesh Divekar