My friend signed an appointment letter with the company, which included the following clause:
"On acceptance of this letter, you are bound to join work at (Company Name) on YYYYMMDD. To enable you to join us sooner than YYYYMMDD, we offer you the option of 'pay in lieu of notice' (PILON) reimbursement. It is further acknowledged and agreed that following the PILON reimbursement by us, you shall continue to work with us for a minimum period of one year. During this period, you will not accept any other form of employment or engage in any other business activity. Failing either of the above conditions, we are liable to claim six months' salary as compensation as well as any costs of litigation, including all reasonable attorney fees."
My friend now does not want to join Company A as he has received a better offer from Company B. Company A insists that if he does not join, he must pay six months' salary as per the clause mentioned above or face legal action. However, my friend is from a financially constrained background and is the sole earner in his family. He questions why he should pay six months' salary when he has not started working for Company A nor received any payment from them.
What should he do in this situation?
"On acceptance of this letter, you are bound to join work at (Company Name) on YYYYMMDD. To enable you to join us sooner than YYYYMMDD, we offer you the option of 'pay in lieu of notice' (PILON) reimbursement. It is further acknowledged and agreed that following the PILON reimbursement by us, you shall continue to work with us for a minimum period of one year. During this period, you will not accept any other form of employment or engage in any other business activity. Failing either of the above conditions, we are liable to claim six months' salary as compensation as well as any costs of litigation, including all reasonable attorney fees."
My friend now does not want to join Company A as he has received a better offer from Company B. Company A insists that if he does not join, he must pay six months' salary as per the clause mentioned above or face legal action. However, my friend is from a financially constrained background and is the sole earner in his family. He questions why he should pay six months' salary when he has not started working for Company A nor received any payment from them.
What should he do in this situation?