Dear Sandeep,
The prospective 'trainees' are already holders of ITI trade certificates. It is proof that they have already undergone apprenticeship training under the Apprentices Act. The absence of essential information pertaining to the length of the training, the consequential employment opportunity in your organization as regular employees, and the provision for engagement of trainees in your standing orders, coupled with the specific orders of your management to appoint them with the designation as trainees below the statutory minimum wages, indicates to me that it is only a tactical arrangement to circumvent the concerned labor laws. If institutional training is absolutely required, the nature of the job should be so critical to retrain and orient the already skilled persons for a definite period involving extra efforts and cost. Even in such a situation, the appointment can be regular with a stipulation for certain compulsory minimum post-training service or refund of the entire cost of training. Therefore, concerning the specific details described above, my opinion is that your management cannot escape compliance with the provisions of the laws relating to Minimum Wages, ESI, and EPF.