Dear Seniors,
In our company, we have a system of Monthly MIS submission by all department heads (we have approximately 14 departments, and they have 4-5 subsections). To measure actual performance against set targets (KRA), management wants a neutral person like HR who can cross-check the MIS, present to the Management committee about each department's performance against set KRA, highlight the deviations from planned targets, and also present the summary report to the management committee on a monthly basis.
I request your opinion on whether HR is the right person for this task. How are other companies handling this? One point I would like to highlight is that we do not have an integrated software (ERP) for MIS generation. HODs find MIS a little tedious, hence it is not submitted on time. The general delay is 8-10 days. Management does not trust HODs because they feel there are chances of misrepresentation of information or exaggeration of achievements; hence, they want HR to participate in summarizing and checking the actual working. Also, management wants only relevant and decision-impacting information, expecting this from HR.
Please suggest what we should do. Should we take this responsibility, or is there a smarter way of handling it?
Thanks and Regards,
Aakansha (HRD)
In our company, we have a system of Monthly MIS submission by all department heads (we have approximately 14 departments, and they have 4-5 subsections). To measure actual performance against set targets (KRA), management wants a neutral person like HR who can cross-check the MIS, present to the Management committee about each department's performance against set KRA, highlight the deviations from planned targets, and also present the summary report to the management committee on a monthly basis.
I request your opinion on whether HR is the right person for this task. How are other companies handling this? One point I would like to highlight is that we do not have an integrated software (ERP) for MIS generation. HODs find MIS a little tedious, hence it is not submitted on time. The general delay is 8-10 days. Management does not trust HODs because they feel there are chances of misrepresentation of information or exaggeration of achievements; hence, they want HR to participate in summarizing and checking the actual working. Also, management wants only relevant and decision-impacting information, expecting this from HR.
Please suggest what we should do. Should we take this responsibility, or is there a smarter way of handling it?
Thanks and Regards,
Aakansha (HRD)