There is no dispute over the definition of contractor, but what will satisfy a contractor as per CLRA is one who undertakes to produce a given result for the establishment, "other than" a mere supply of goods or articles....... You should see the words "other than" and read it as one who undertakes to produce a given result by himself or through other labours supplied by him other than mere supply of goods and services. The latter words signify that one who supplies raw materials will not become a contractor even though he also brings in something which will lead to produce a given result. Similarly, persons who render some service like transporting of raw materials and finished goods to or from the factory (transports and logistics), provision of finance to the company and making transfer of funds possible(banks), giving promotional advertising to the products (advertising) etc are also assisting the company directly. If all these are going to become contractors, then our bank managers and other officers, drivers who bring materials or take finished goods from the factory and those actors who do fantastic work in advertisement movies will also become part of CLRA. But they are not because they are providing some service and we have entered into a contract for their service.
There can be 38 or even more number of taxi drivers with whom you might have made arrangements, and these drivers may be driving the car for your guests only, but when they are paid according to the trips or per km run, it should only be considered as "purchase of a service". CLRA will attract only when you PAY WAGES for the service. The taxi fare or the purchase value is not just wages or the cost of labour of the driver but will certainly include fuel cost, depreciation, interest etc. Therefore, I strongly believe that in your case the provisions of the CLRA Act will not come.
Madhu.T.K