The High Court of Kerala yesterday delivered a landmark judgement that surrogate mother should be given post maternity benefits by the employer. Rejecting the plea of Kerala Live Stock Development Board (the employer) that the Service Rules of the organisation( a PSU) does not provide for maternity benefits to employee who delivers child by artificial means, the Hon. Court ordered that such women employees are entitled to post maternity benefits equallant to natural mothers. The court observed that maternity benefits include leave for taking care of the child and 2 nursing breaks until the child attains 15 months old. The court said that from day one of the delivery, the petitioner is required to be treated as mother of the new born baby. Court also declared that there ought not be any discrimination of a woman as far as maternity benefits are concerned on the grounds that the baby was obtained out of surrogacy.
The complete text of the order is yet to come. The surrogacy has been accepted in practice though we are yet to come out with legal legislation. Therefore, the denial of maternity benefits to employee who became mother of a baby by surrogacy had been a matter of discussion then also. There are two important issues around this. The present judgement spells about granting of leave and benefits at par with the PSU staff service rules. Will it have any relevance to Maternity Benefit Act? Maternity Benefits Act says that no woman shall be asked to do any tedious job while she is pregnant. She is entitled to take 6 weeks leave before the expected date of delivery. If the judgement covers establishments covered by Maternity Benefits Act also, then will she be entitled to leave before child birth? It is understood that post delivery leave and benefits like nursing breaks should be given to the mother to take care of her baby.
I request team members to contribute their valuable thoughts in it.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K
The complete text of the order is yet to come. The surrogacy has been accepted in practice though we are yet to come out with legal legislation. Therefore, the denial of maternity benefits to employee who became mother of a baby by surrogacy had been a matter of discussion then also. There are two important issues around this. The present judgement spells about granting of leave and benefits at par with the PSU staff service rules. Will it have any relevance to Maternity Benefit Act? Maternity Benefits Act says that no woman shall be asked to do any tedious job while she is pregnant. She is entitled to take 6 weeks leave before the expected date of delivery. If the judgement covers establishments covered by Maternity Benefits Act also, then will she be entitled to leave before child birth? It is understood that post delivery leave and benefits like nursing breaks should be given to the mother to take care of her baby.
I request team members to contribute their valuable thoughts in it.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K