Dear All,
It is time to enter into a long-term wage settlement with the Trade Union. It is a practice of the Management to impose a term of the wage settlement stating that the Union should cooperate to improve productivity through any innovative methods or technology introduced by the Management, after which the Management may consider any wage revision as part of the settlement.
Now, it is expected that the Trade Union will demand that the Management not impose such a clause in the terms of settlement. They contend that they have exhausted all possible ways to improve productivity, claiming that all methods and technologies have already been adopted by both the workers and the Management.
My queries are as follows:
1. Are they legally justified in demanding that the Management not impose such a clause in the wage settlement?
2. In such an event, should the Management defer the wage revision or entering into a wage settlement?
3. Are there any other possible queries that need to be addressed in this context?
I seek expert advice on how to handle this situation diplomatically without causing harm to either party.
It is time to enter into a long-term wage settlement with the Trade Union. It is a practice of the Management to impose a term of the wage settlement stating that the Union should cooperate to improve productivity through any innovative methods or technology introduced by the Management, after which the Management may consider any wage revision as part of the settlement.
Now, it is expected that the Trade Union will demand that the Management not impose such a clause in the terms of settlement. They contend that they have exhausted all possible ways to improve productivity, claiming that all methods and technologies have already been adopted by both the workers and the Management.
My queries are as follows:
1. Are they legally justified in demanding that the Management not impose such a clause in the wage settlement?
2. In such an event, should the Management defer the wage revision or entering into a wage settlement?
3. Are there any other possible queries that need to be addressed in this context?
I seek expert advice on how to handle this situation diplomatically without causing harm to either party.