Dear All,
Putting forward a live case study. In a particular department of a manufacturing company, a worker is unable to do his normal duties due to certain medical problems. He is also suffering from some sort of mental/psychological problem which makes him unable to work intelligently or even comprehend an order properly by the executives. At present, he hardly does anything except for small errands like carrying some tools or documents, etc. The management has written to his family to get him proper treatment at the company hospital. However, his family (wife & 2 children) are scared that the hospital might declare him invalid leading to a job loss. For them, it would be better if he continued to attend the office even if he was unable to work, so that at least there's money coming home every month. The said employee is, however, very punctual and attends duty daily. His family members escort him to the company gates every day and then back from the gate after duty hours.
The promotion policy is determined by 2 major factors - (a) attendance more than 240 days and (b) performance. To be promotable, the employee needs to have more than 240 days in the last 4 years and a performance rating better than 'C' and no disciplinary proceedings underway and/or in punishment.
The union(s) have made some sort of an internal pact with the production head of the particular department, where they allow him to come to duty without taking any disciplinary or other measures in lieu of not giving him a promotion when due. It was found out that the department, in fact, had not been filling up his yearly confidential records for about 5 years now. When the incident was discovered, the department was made to fill up his CCR for the last few years. It was also thought that following this measure, a note would be prepared ordering the worker to go for a compulsory medical test. The future legal position of not giving CCR and promotion was also kept in mind.
In the meantime, what else should be done and what should be the course of action of the HR department.
Regards,
Jay
Putting forward a live case study. In a particular department of a manufacturing company, a worker is unable to do his normal duties due to certain medical problems. He is also suffering from some sort of mental/psychological problem which makes him unable to work intelligently or even comprehend an order properly by the executives. At present, he hardly does anything except for small errands like carrying some tools or documents, etc. The management has written to his family to get him proper treatment at the company hospital. However, his family (wife & 2 children) are scared that the hospital might declare him invalid leading to a job loss. For them, it would be better if he continued to attend the office even if he was unable to work, so that at least there's money coming home every month. The said employee is, however, very punctual and attends duty daily. His family members escort him to the company gates every day and then back from the gate after duty hours.
The promotion policy is determined by 2 major factors - (a) attendance more than 240 days and (b) performance. To be promotable, the employee needs to have more than 240 days in the last 4 years and a performance rating better than 'C' and no disciplinary proceedings underway and/or in punishment.
The union(s) have made some sort of an internal pact with the production head of the particular department, where they allow him to come to duty without taking any disciplinary or other measures in lieu of not giving him a promotion when due. It was found out that the department, in fact, had not been filling up his yearly confidential records for about 5 years now. When the incident was discovered, the department was made to fill up his CCR for the last few years. It was also thought that following this measure, a note would be prepared ordering the worker to go for a compulsory medical test. The future legal position of not giving CCR and promotion was also kept in mind.
In the meantime, what else should be done and what should be the course of action of the HR department.
Regards,
Jay