Dear Seniors,
My company laid two months (60 days) of notice period for separation.
In my case, I was willing to serve the notice period of two months.
After few days of my resignation, my manager (who has the authority to decide the relieving date) mentioned the relieving date and directed the HR to take on the proceedings for F&F calculation etc.,
The company's policy book says "In cases where the management intends to relieve the employee earlier than the notice period HR will take approval to waive off the notice period".
My manager has the authority to decide the relieving date and also approve the waiving off of notice period.
What I understand from this policy is, if the concerned authority decides the relieving date it is equivalent to an approval to be forwarded to HR guys. With this approval HR can waive off the notice period.
I was relieved on tenth day of resignation.
During F&F calculation, the HR team asked me to pay for the remaining 50 days of the notice period, which I think is absurd. They stated that even though I was willing to serve the notice period, the manager wants to relieve me early and also he didn't approve the notice period waive off. In effect, my employment was terminated the 10th day and I have to pay for the remaining 50 days (gross salary) which is a huge amount.
When I pointed out the clauses in the policy book and asked for an explanation, the legal section head and the HR said that "Theory and practise are always different".
Kindly help me on this. Please let me know is there any practice where the employer relieves the employee earlier than the notice period, even if he's willing to serve, and asks him to pay for the notice period not served.
Also let me know whether or not a company is entitled to abide by the policy books made by them. Can I file a lawsuit against the company?
Jiraiya
My company laid two months (60 days) of notice period for separation.
In my case, I was willing to serve the notice period of two months.
After few days of my resignation, my manager (who has the authority to decide the relieving date) mentioned the relieving date and directed the HR to take on the proceedings for F&F calculation etc.,
The company's policy book says "In cases where the management intends to relieve the employee earlier than the notice period HR will take approval to waive off the notice period".
My manager has the authority to decide the relieving date and also approve the waiving off of notice period.
What I understand from this policy is, if the concerned authority decides the relieving date it is equivalent to an approval to be forwarded to HR guys. With this approval HR can waive off the notice period.
I was relieved on tenth day of resignation.
During F&F calculation, the HR team asked me to pay for the remaining 50 days of the notice period, which I think is absurd. They stated that even though I was willing to serve the notice period, the manager wants to relieve me early and also he didn't approve the notice period waive off. In effect, my employment was terminated the 10th day and I have to pay for the remaining 50 days (gross salary) which is a huge amount.
When I pointed out the clauses in the policy book and asked for an explanation, the legal section head and the HR said that "Theory and practise are always different".
Kindly help me on this. Please let me know is there any practice where the employer relieves the employee earlier than the notice period, even if he's willing to serve, and asks him to pay for the notice period not served.
Also let me know whether or not a company is entitled to abide by the policy books made by them. Can I file a lawsuit against the company?
Jiraiya