How To Deal Departmental Differences???

Dear Friends,

I have joined an engineering project-based company recently as HR head.

In my company, I face a problem of interdepartmental differences. Project people claim to be more important than production, and vice versa. The Project department, Design Department, and Production department all consider support functions like Accounts, Admin, and HR as least important. This is creating a tug-of-war-like situation between support and core functions for credibility, importance, and recognition from management. This has resulted in some incidences of non-cooperation and blame games. Now, the management is frustrated with this situation.

However, the common feeling among all the employees is that they want the company to grow and develop. They are not understanding that support functions and core functions should go hand in hand for the required result. Team-building training programs and Role effectiveness programs have not been that effective.

Kindly guide me on how to ease this situation?

Regards,

Sapna

Dear Ms. Sapna,

Your post is the BEST EXAMPLE of EMPLOYEE INFERIOR ATTITUDE leading to a SUPERIORITY COMPLEX. If you want more members to share their views, including me, you must start a new thread enabling members to post their appropriate suggestions. Please follow the "SYSTEM IN PRACTICE."

If you don't know how to start a new thread, please let us know, and the moderators will guide you. Perhaps you need to explore this website to gather more information about its TERMS OF SERVICE, PRIVACY POLICY, etc.

With profound regards,

Dear Sapna,

Your last sentence spoke volumes - "Team building training programs and Role effectiveness programs have not been that effective."

The sentence should serve as an eye-opener to all the trainers who preach team building for every organizational ill. If you had not given this statement, I am sure there would have been a flurry of suggestions on conducting team building training. Not that I am against training on teamwork. However, teamwork is output and not input that many trainers don't understand. Secondly, teamwork is the output of the organization's culture. Fix the culture, and teamwork will follow automatically.

Now coming to discussing the solution to your problem. Why has this problem occurred? It could be because of the following reasons. A few could be within your control, and a few could be out of your control:

a) Frankly speaking, it is a weakness of your management or top leadership who started giving prominence to 1-2 key departments when the company started. Now it has become part of your organization's culture to give step-brotherly treatment to supporting departments.

b) What about having a strong process-centric approach in executing the work of every department? When I say "process-centric," I mean going beyond ISO 9000 standards. There have to be well-defined processes for every single department.

c) The next thing is about job rotation. I doubt it is also implemented. Job rotation removes a blinkered view of the department. Make a job rotation plan and implement it vigorously.

d) Conduct the training on "How to Build Organization's Culture?" It is the culture of the company that fosters the growth of the company.

e) Another important training for all the department heads required is on "How to Create Positive Conflict?" Conflict handling is not just sweeping under the carpet, giving a semblance of false harmony. However, managers must be capable of eradicating negative conflict and substituting positive one in its lieu. It requires tremendous maturity on the part of managers to do this. It is no easy task as managers need to learn how to allow juniors to challenge their views.

f) The next important training is on the organization's values. Your problem of 1-2 departments dominating other departments is because they are not told "fairness" as the organization's value. Every manager, howsoever smart he/she may be, should have a value-based management style. How can your organization's value allow discrimination based on the function of an employee?

g) As an interim measure, start showing how the support function also contributes to the cost-saving activities and it is not just a few key departments.

h) Another interim measure is to calculate the cost of attrition. Do you have figures that show that attrition is more in the support function than in core functions? If yes, then use it as a tool to show that revenue generation is important. However, controlling revenue leakage by controlling attrition is also equally important.

There are a few other things, and typing the whole thing is a little cumbersome. You may give me a call, and we shall discuss the matter further.

Thanks,

Dinesh V Divekar

"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance."

Dear Dinesh,

Thank you for your valuable inputs. I am planning to try job rotation and a few training programs on managing culture and positive conflict with some different trainers.

However, could you please brief me on how to implement a process-centric approach in executing work? Also, could you please provide me with the contact details of good trainers in these topics in Pune?

Looking forward to your response.

Regards,
Sapna

Dear Sapna,

I often travel to other cities to conduct training programs. I can conduct training programs for the managers of your company as well. It was I who offered you the solution of training on positive conflict or organizational culture; therefore, ideally, I should be given a chance to conduct the training. If you hire my services, you would be dealing with the training provider directly. I don't outsource training further to anyone else. This itself will bring down your cost as you would be eliminating the commission of the middle-persons.

Thanks,
DVD

Dear Sapana,

Your problem of "They are not understanding that support functions and core functions should go hand in hand for the required result" itself has a solution for the same. If departments are not understanding the importance of other departments, then take one or two key people from each department and ask them to conduct a session on workflow and its importance from a business point of view before all the other departments. It will take time and will require consent from key people and management. However, it will help in understanding the need and importance of other departments.

Moreover, you may explain to your management not to give prominence to one department over the other.

Regards,
Nitu

This is a real internal threat to an organization and should be addressed immediately. The race for one-upmanship has always existed and will remain so forever. One has to bear in mind that no one can change individual mentality and behavior.

The immediate step I would recommend is to chart down a Job Description of each Department detailing every role, task, duration, duty, responsibility, reporting, and end of task exit policy where it's required to pass on the document or information to another department. Identify connectors among departments, the work, information, and document flow system, and lay down stringent rules to ensure every employee adheres to the same. You might need to revisit the organization chart. This process might take some time but should prove fruitful.

Dear Sir,

I endorse your reply and its worth a billion dollars because it is a fact.

Dear Sapna,

In regard to TRAINING ACTIVITIES, organizations need to FOCUS on MEASURING the DEVELOPMENT OF CORE SKILLS POST TRAINING required for EMPLOYEES' and ORGANIZATION'S PERFORMANCE. They are only interested in "RUNNING THE SHOW" but not in "MANAGING & IMPROVING FURTHER" (LEADERSHIP SKILLS), which are supposed to be the MAIN ROLE of TOP MANAGEMENT.

You need to focus on WORK CULTURE promoting a PROFESSIONAL APPROACH, POSITIVE ATTITUDE, BROAD-MINDED MATURITY, and how best you can educate your employees on the practical concepts of WHY, WHERE, WHEN, and HOW to demonstrate the ATTITUDE of "I" & "WE" in your organization.

With profound regards