Dear Member,
It is for the courts to decide whether the termination is illegal or legal. We can only say that this termination seems to be justified or not justified.
In service matters if we see that the termination of service is not accordance with the applicable law or it seems to us that the action of the management is not justified then we seek remedial measures before the appropriate forum. Who is this person working in the company is not known to us? In what capacity he is working? What are his duties? Whether he is covered under the definition of the ‘workman’? Whether Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is applicable to this company? In my opinion there are two forums for redressal of our grievances i.e. one by approaching the Conciliation Officer under the I D Act, 1947 by raising a demand notice if the person is a workman under this Act & the other is to approach Civil Court if the person is not covered under the definition of the workman under this Act. In the second case if the management terminates the services in breach of the terms & condition of employment then the person can approach the Civil Court as told by other members. In such cases where it is agreed by the parties that either party will give one month notice or payment in lieu thereof then in that case it is not necessary to give notice & either party can give payment in lieu of notice. In the first situation also a workman can be removed from service if have hot worked continuously for period of 240 days in the preceding twelve months. While retrenching a workman we can give payment in lieu of notice under the I D Act & it is always not necessary to serve notice on the employee/workman. Before providing any advice on the issue of service termination one should go through each & every detail before finalizing the course of remedial measure.
Opinion submitted as requested.
With Regards,
R.N.Khola