Strategic Orientation is a focus on the big picture, an attention to defining the future direction of the enterprise, and in using this definition to direct and guide the efforts of all in the organization.
The 5 Levels of Strategic Orientation
Most people would agree that Strategic Orientation is a positive factor for organisations. But what does that mean? How do you determine how Strategically Oriented your organisation is, and what can you do to improve the situation?
There are 5 levels of Strategic Orientation. Each one builds on the previous one, providing you with a road map and a measure of progress towards Strategic Orientation. The 5 levels are:
Engaging in Strategic Dialogue
Strategic Planning
Strategic Measurement
Developing a Strategic Calendar
Integrating Strategic Dialogue
Engaging in Strategic DialogueThe first step towards Strategic Orientation is, very simply, to start talking about strategy. According to Dr. Robert Kaplan (personal communication, 2000), 85% of Executive Teams spend less than one hour per month discussing strategy. If an executive team can't find the time to lift their sights of the day to day operational and tactical issues to talk about strategy, then it should come as not surprise that it will not become an organisational priority. The organisation is likely to remain in "fire-fighting" mode indefinitely.
It is easy enough to actually measure the amount of time executives spend discussing strategy. The optimum time will, of course, depended on the competitiveness of the industry in which they operate (refer to Porter's 5 Forces model for one method of determining industry competitiveness). Sheer length of discussion though, whilst a good start, is not enough. It is important to focus on the quality of the discussion as well. Quality Strategic Dialogue requires continuing questioning of assumptions (ref: Senge for Double Loop Accounting, Balancing Advocacy and Inquiry). More complex techniques, such as Scenario Planning are also useful tools for increasing the quality of Strategic Dialogue.
Strategic PlanningOnce the Strategic Dialogue is underway, it is important to formalise the outcome in a Strategic Plan. This should be a written document summarising the Strategic Dialogue under at least the following broad headings:
External Analysis: A shared view on the external environment as it is relevant to the company. Again, Porter's 5 Forces Model provides a useful framework here. The external analysis should also include a shared assessment of the opportunities and threats which the organisation faces.
Internal Analysis: A shared view of the internal state of the company. The McKinsey 7-S Model may provide a useful framework. The internal analysis should also include a shared assessment of the company's strengths and weaknesses.
Vision: Some form of vision or mission statement is required to describe the company's ideal future state. This ideal future state should be cognisant of both he internal and external analysis, drawing on the company's strengths to take advantage of opportunities.
Implementation Plan: Having formulated a vision of the future, the company needs to plan specific initiatives to achieve it. The Implementation Plan should take the form of a project of projects - a high level plan reflecting the achievement of specific strategic goals.
Most organisations have strategic plans, but often these are shelved - never to be looked at until next years Strategic Planning conference. Often, they are also considered to be top secret, highly confidential, and only to be seen by a few select top managers. It is not surprising then, that such plans are seldom successfully implemented. To be successful, the Strategic Plan must be widely communicated to everyone who is to be involved in its execution, and held up for scrutiny, challenge and modification. The only good Strategic Plan is a living Strategic Plan.
To measure the success of your Strategic Plan, you could measure:
The percentage of employees who have read the Strategic Plan.
The percentage of employees who can tell you, more or less, what the Strategic Plan is, without having to refer back to the document.
The percentage of corporate projects or initiatives which are directly aligned with and/or indicated by the Strategic Plan.
Strategic MeasurementOnce the Strategic Plan is in place, it is very helpful to be able to measure its success. This can be measured along two dimensions:
Are we doing what we set out to do in the plan. (Input Measures)
Is what we set out to do in the plan have the effect that we anticipated. (Output Measures)
The Balanced Scorecard provides a systemic methodology for creating Strategic Measurements. It is most important though, to ensure that you have at least one measure for every significant aspect of your Strategy. About 16 measures is usually ideal - more than 25 measures might suggest a lack of strategic focus and become difficult to manage, and less that 12 almost surely indicates and oversimplification of the business.
A good framework for establishing Strategic Measures involves:
Establishing specific Strategic Objectives aligned to your Vision.
Identifying specific variables that indicate progress towards the achievement (or otherwise) of that Strategic Objective. (It may be necessary to identify more than one variable per objective as objectives may be hard to quantify and may thus require proxy variables.)
Set targets for each variable. These targets may be planned to change over time (e.g. to increase by 2% every month for the next 3 years) or may be constants. Change targets should always have a specific time dimension.
Devise specific initiatives to achieve each change target. (These should be the same initiatives as would be documented in the Strategic Plan.)
To measure the success of your Strategic Measurement, you could measure:
The percentage of people who can tell you what the Strategic Measures are, and which ones are up and or down for the most recent period.
The extent to which deviation for the measurement targets decreases over time after the introduction of the measure.
Developing a Strategic CalendarIn order to ensure that the Strategic Plan lives, a Strategic Calendar should be prepared. The Strategic Calendar depicts the organisations Strategic Planning processes and events, as well as the relationships between them. Ideally, the Strategic Calendar should depict an annual planning cycle. The objectives of the Strategic Calendar are to:
Ensure Strategic Dialogue, Planning and Measurement take place on an ongoing basis. Often, Strategic Planning is an annual event, and there is little else to ensure that any thought is given to organisational strategy throughout the rest of the year. The Strategic Calendar should ensure ongoing and regular attention is paid to different aspects of the strategy on a rotating basis. This ensures that the Strategic Plan is continually reviewed and updated.
Ensure Strategic Dialogue, Planning and Measurement take place at different levels. Clearly, an organisation would not like to review and update its entire strategy on a frequent basis. This would introduce uncertainty into the process, which would deteriorate the advantages gained from Strategic Planning in the first place. The Strategic Calendar should slice and dice the Strategic Planning process into different levels and components, and should ensure that these are each addressed in a logical and systematic process.
Integrate the Strategic Planning processes and events with those of other functions of the organisation. Strategic Planning exists as part of the greater organisation process and is particularly interlinked with Financial Planning and Human Resource Planning (particularly performance appraisal and incentivisation). The Strategic Calendar should reflect these interdependencies, ensuring that each activity is seen as part of the greater whole, rather than as an unwelcome chore.
Integrating Strategic DialogueFinally, the organisation is ready to weave Strategic Dialogue into the very fabric of the organisation's communications. Strategy involves establishing the metaphors and mental models which underlie the way in which people think about the organisatio