Dear Prasoon,
The Supreme Court had held in Lalappa Lingappa Vs Lakshmi Vishnu Textile Mills, Sholapur, that in terms of definition of “continuous service” in section 2 (c) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, employees who remained absent without pay and had actually worked for less than 240 days were denied gratuity. Since the enforcement of this rule resulted in denial of gratuity to a number of employees whose short term absence remained unregularised it was proposed to amplify the definition of continuous service to provide
(a)that an employee working in an establishment which works for less than six days in a week and who is not in uninterrupted service for one year, shall be deemed to be in continuous service for a period of one year if he has actually worked for 190 days in the preceding year, and
(b)that for determining the continuous period of six months for the purpose of payment of gratuity, an employee should have completed half the number of days of actual work which constitute “continuous service” for a whole year.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K