Dear All,
You may remember the Historic September 2010 brought about changes to the industrial Disputes Act. One important change is the change made in the Section 11 –Enforcing the Awards of Labour Court which has been touched upon in an earlier post .
In section 11 of the principal Act, after sub-section eight , the following sub-sections shall be inserted, namely:
“(9) Every award made, order issued or settlement arrived at by or before Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal shall be executed in accordance with the procedure laid down for execution of orders and decree of a Civil Court under order 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(10) The Labour Court or Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, shall transmit any award, order or settlement to a Civil Court having jurisdiction and such Civil Court shall execute the award, order or settlement as if it were a decree passed by it.”
The Execution provisions of CPC is :
51. Powers of Court to enforce execution: Subject to such conditions and limitations as may be prescribed, the Court may, on the application of the decree-holder, order execution of the decree :
(a) by delivery of any property specifically decreed;
(b) by attachment and sale or by the sale without attachment of any property;
(c) by arrest and detention in prison for such period not exceeding the period specified in section 58, where arrest and detention is permissible under that section;
(d) by appointing a receiver; or
(e) in such other manner as the nature of the relief granted may require:
Provided that, where the decree is for the payment of money, execution by detention in prison shall not be ordered unless, after giving the judgment-debtor an opportunity of showing cause why he should not be committed to prison, the Court, for reasons recorded in writing, is satisfied;
(a) that the judgment-debtor, with the object or effect of obstructing or delaying the execution of the decree,
(i) is likely to abscond or leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court, or
(ii) has, after the institution of the suit in which the decree was passed, dishonestly transferred, concealed, or removed any part of his property, or committed any other act of bad faith in relation to his property, or
(b) that the judgment-debtor has, or has had since the date of the decree, the means to pay the amount of the decree or some substantial part thereof and refuses or neglects or has refused or neglected to pay the same, or
(c) that the decree is for a sum for which the judgment-debtor was bound in a fiduciary capacity to account.
Explanation :In the calculation of the means of the judgment-debtor for the purposes of clause (b), there shall be left out of account any property which, by or under any law or custom having the force of law for the time being in force, is exempt from attachment in execution of the decree.
ORDER XXIX- SUITS BY OR AGAINST CORPORATIONS
3 . Power to require personal attendance of officer of corporation— The Court may, at any stage of the suit, require the personal appearance of the secretary or of any director, or other principal officer of the corporation who may be able to answer material questions relating to the suit.
By introduction of the provision the award of Labour Court / Tribunals is now additionally executable by a Civil Court. After the Labour Court/Tribunal passes the award it shall be automatically transmitted to the Civil Court for execution. By this process both the moveable and immovable property of the Judgment Debtor i.e. the person/company against whom the award is passed can be attached. Also the Judgment Debtor can be arrested and put in prison. Earlier the awards were executed by the Revenue Recovery process alone.
The Top management of the Staffing Industry needs to take the legal Process initiated by any Temporary Employees seriously as otherwise ultimately the Directors can be required to be present in Court,in the Execution process and even be detained in a Civil prison on failure of compliance subject to the above legal provisions.
Managing Directors need to be very cautious and call for timely reports from their Compliance Team on the existence of Temporary Employee related litigation or disputes and direct their immediate resolution.Randomly they should directly test check such issues with their Legal counsel handling such cases and direct resolution by direct intervention as otherwise they will become answerable to the Courts of Law..This way the Staffing Company can ensure zero level of Litigation and keep sailing in smooth risk free Business.
With Regards
V.Sounder Rajan
Legal Consultants for Staffing & Recruiting Industry
E-mail : rajanassociates@eth,net,