Was this one month's long leave communicated directly or indirectly to your seniors? DId your family member(S) try to convey the message on your behalf to the right authorities? Atleast a phone call?
She falsly alleged that
1) You married her 5 years back
2) Now since you are planning to get married to someone, you mean to say she just wishes to hamper that or stain your character by this.
You said she is a divorcee and mother of two children.
Can you let us know the tenure of employment with the company - both yours as well as the lady's.
You said you were in custody of police from 25/04/2013 to 26/05/2013. How can the judge issue you a bail on 20/04/2013 when you were not in police custody that time????
Please proof read and make changes....
Assuming that you meant to say it was 20/5/2013, so since bail was issued on 20th may what you did in the lock up till 26th may???
Secondly, what makes me think is
Just because I go and complain in the police station that I've been married to XYZ for so long and now he don't own me and is trying to get married to someone else, do you think the police will go and arrest Mr.. XYZ???
I will have to first prove that I have been married to XYZ.
Did you ask the police about the arrest warrant or any proofs against you?
Photograph or Marriage certificate or witnesses?
Who signed in front of the registrar to get your marriage soleminized???
or do you mean to say that police were able to keep you in police custody for around a month's long time without any proofs against you???
Please explain the confusion and the gaps....
I think the matter is being escalated in your workplace. You are being terminated for many reasons -
1) Unexplained and uninformed leave for a month
2) Been in police custody for so long (for whatever reasons)
3) A lady is accusing you of marriage.
Think from a company's perspective, a company don't want to keep a person who has a case filed against him. I can understand you're still not proved guilty and hence have equal chances that you're right in your place. But the unexplained prolonged leaves is enough to terminate you. Just check the separation policy in your appointment letter or the consequences of taking unexplained leaves for such long duration in your employment manual.
This is a problem because i believe in your posts ahead you did mention that the letter was sent to you via speed post that bears the date as 30th May which was delivered to you on 31st May. However in the letter the issuance date is 16th may and they asked you to meet them on or before 21st may. here, the case in your favor and you can seek explanation.
Getting regular incentives for your performance is a good thing.
Next, did they mention that they're terminating you on performance grounds? So how does this become relevant.
If we look at this generally, just because a person is a good performer don't define his/her character.
I do not mean to point you out but just a general note that we can't take this argument and it won't work for you.
=============
These arguments are not much valid for the following reasons or counter arguments -
(Please note that following is just a general statement and do not take it personally. I wish to put forth the two sides of the case. I want to be a devil's advocate and present you both pros and cons. Stated below are things that can work against you or arguments against you.)
She may argue that you both fell in love, but both of you knew that there would be complications. So you got yourself married and hid it from families to avoid a scene. It is possible that the female claims that the male promised her that once they get married, he would eventually let his family know about their relationship and would convince them to accept her. But till that time they should live normally as they did. She was waiting for him to convince his parents but now since his family is getting him married, she has no option but to blurt out the truth.
The above statement is one of the possibilities... There may be other things, can't think of it now...
About using the title - Mrs or using the husband's surname, would again like to add that there are many females who do not change their last names after marriage. I have a female colleague who's married but uses her maiden name. My cousin uses her maiden name. You can't have a doubt because of that. A lose factor of argument again. I do not know how legally binding it is to adopt to husband's surname, but increasingly females are not thrashing their maiden name.
Again if you are raising this argument, one will ask why should she bring problems to your marriage? Is there any differences between you two?
Why would any dignified lady claim herself as a wife of any man and too for such long tenure of 5 years????
Any explanations???