Dear Raj Kumar Ji,
With due respect to you, sir, I submit my views as follows:
Even in FTC, there should not be a reduction in emolument. Negotiations should be for a higher emolument.
I too have heard about the reduction in basic pay by way of PUNISHMENT by the Competent Authority in PSU and Government services. But in the private sector, there is no such reduction in basic pay by way of PUNISHMENT.
In the case of an FTC consultant, you can negotiate for lesser emolument. However, in the case of an FTC employee, you cannot.
I do not agree with you. According to my view, DA is a part of the salary. Salary means basic plus DA. We need not mention the DA separately. Therefore, we call it a basic consolidated component also. In one of the postings by B. Saikumar (who is one of the learned contributing members of this forum), it is rightly said by him that the DA is that part of the component of salary which is meant for neutralizing the erosion of basic wages by the cost of inflation.
With due respect to you, sir, I submit my views as follows:
Even in FTC, there should not be a reduction in emolument. Negotiations should be for a higher emolument.
I too have heard about the reduction in basic pay by way of PUNISHMENT by the Competent Authority in PSU and Government services. But in the private sector, there is no such reduction in basic pay by way of PUNISHMENT.
In the case of an FTC consultant, you can negotiate for lesser emolument. However, in the case of an FTC employee, you cannot.
I do not agree with you. According to my view, DA is a part of the salary. Salary means basic plus DA. We need not mention the DA separately. Therefore, we call it a basic consolidated component also. In one of the postings by B. Saikumar (who is one of the learned contributing members of this forum), it is rightly said by him that the DA is that part of the component of salary which is meant for neutralizing the erosion of basic wages by the cost of inflation.