Hai friends,
Yah, it is hot enough. We need not personify anybody while we discuss concepts. Without using 'You' and 'I', can we discuss? Now the point is when SC pointed out and questions the life of Radha and Krishna, we have to take it with a pinch of salt. People like me, more of traditionalists, could not keep silent.
In the Indian context, the institutions like family, marriage are built up on the roots of love trust and belief. Now, if the new verdict challenges the old ones, definitely we need to think a lot.
Like people said, I like pre-marital sex before I got married. But I don't like the same law if is applicable to my wife. I know since the last two days, hundreds of parents caught up with headache and indulge in the yes no digression in this topic. They are afraid of their daughters who are likely to go aggressive now on. It is not that I like or you like; it is what happens to the very strength of the social fabric?
As I pointed earlier, if there are no laws to protect our strengths, why don't we make some? The psychologists are pointing out that sex is bodily need and love is different. But to an old man like me sex without love is beastly. The life of a wife and husband tied first with love and affection and then sex. If this is not true, they must part the moment they don't have sex after their 60's. Love is the binding thread in life and also in family.
Just because sex is bodily need, nobody will do it with anybody even with mutual consent.